Flexural Performance Evaluation Of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars (GFRP) In Doubly Reinforced Beams: An Experimental Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63278/mme.vi.1762Keywords:
double-reinforced beam, glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP), maximum load capacity, tensile strength, and sustainable substitute.Abstract
using the primary goal of evaluating their efficacy as a sustainable substitute for conventional steel reinforcement, this experimental study investigates the flexural performance of double-reinforced concrete beams strengthened using Glass Fibre fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. Recent years have seen a significant increase in interest in the use of GFRP bars in concrete buildings due to their inherent benefits, which include increased durability, reduced material weight, and corrosion resistance. Five examples were manufactured for this investigation; two included only GFRP bars, two included hybrid bars, and one had only steel bar beams for comparison. The beams are full-scale, with dimensions of 152 and 230 mm in cross-section and 3000 mm in length. With a factored load of 2.5 kips/ft, the beam specimens were constructed as standard doubly reinforced beam designs, with 5#4 bars in tension and 2#4 bars in compression. T-Rod International produced the GFRP bars utilized in this investigation. To assess their flexural behavior, including load-deflection response, cracking patterns, and ultimate load capacity, beam specimens were put through three-point bending tests. The efficiency of GFRP bars in doubly reinforced beams in comparison to traditional steel reinforcement is assessed through the analysis of experimental data. Deflection, ultimate strength, and failure mechanisms are the main provisions being examined. GFRP bars exhibit brittle behavior and a 54% greater tensile strength than steel bars. Steel-reinforced beams have a 30% greater ultimate load capacity than pure GFRP-reinforced beams, whereas hybrid GFRP-reinforced beams have an 18% lower ultimate load capacity. In GFRP and hybrid samples, the maximum mid-span deflection caused by the ultimate load is significantly greater than in steel samples.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shah Nawaz Khan Buledi, Masaud Ahmad khan, Asjad Javed, Qaim Shah, Dr. M. Adil Khan, Sajed Hussain Shah, Uzair Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their published articles online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website, social networks like ResearchGate or Academia), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Except where otherwise noted, the content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



According to the